Sunset Traveler

« A (formerly) secret beach: where in the world is this? | MAIN | How to gear up for the Tour de France (and a fun free thing to do this month) »

Posted by Sunset, June 30, 2008 in Southern California

by Matthew Jaffe, Sunset senior writer

Global warming and rising sea levels notwithstanding, they’re not making any new oceanfront property. So when a new stretch of coast opens to the public, such as the Point Buchon Trail in San Luis Obispo County,  that’s big news. (For this and other secret beaches, check out July’s Sunset.)

Point_buchon_sign_logo

Growing up in Chicago, the California coast had an almost mythical quality for me and in my 20+ years out here, I’ve managed to hit just about every reasonably accessible stretch between the border and San Francisco—plus four of the Channel Islands and Santa Catalina. Thanks to my cub reporter days at the Lompoc Record, I was even able to get out on many sections of the 30-mile-long Vandenberg Air Force Base coast.

But there remained one sizable gap in my curriculum beachae. For years, I’d hike the Bluff Trail at Montana de Oro State Park, edging along its coves, before reaching what always seemed to be the world’s ugliest fence and beyond it, grazing cows who clearly had no appreciation of the coastal views somewhere past their snouts. This was Pacific Gas & Electric land, part of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant facility, and off limits for decades.

Buchon_pyramid
But now with the opening of the trail, a roughly 2-mile stretch of this coastline with spectacular sea stacks and formations, can be explored from Thursdays through Sundays.

Go to the end of the road at Montana de Oro, and there’s a kiosk where you sign in for access. After crossing golden grasslands (still sprinkled with poppies as recently as of a couple weeks ago), you reach the first beach and from there the views of the coastline just get better and better on the roughly 4-mile roundtrip.

Buchon_cove

Sure, you'll still find a few reminders that this isn’t parkland and you’re asked to be back to the kiosk by 4:30, thus limiting what I imagine would be amazing sunset shots.

Buchon_warning

But for now I was just thrilled to get out there. Because this stretch of coast ranks with the very best that California has to offer

Point_buchon_rocks .

Comments

According to Envirozine (Environment Canada's on line magazine) a forest fire involving primarily conifers will produce approximately 13 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide for each hectacre (2.7 acres) burned.

About 1,420 fires were burning more than 356,134 acres (139,671 hectares), according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

So, that's (356,134 acres) x (13 million tons of CO2 / 2.7 acres) = 1,714,719 MILLION tons of carbon dioxide liberated into the environment.

Hmmmm.....now that's 1.7 TRILLION tons of harmful carbon dioxides injected into our precious environment by the rubes in California, who claim to want to stop global warming, IN JUST THIS CALIFORNIA WEEK ALONE.

One thing for sure, California is incapable of managing it's forests, which are an international resource, and is HARMING the environment by dumping carbon into the atmosphere.

Posted by:Ray | June 30, 2008 at 11:45 AM

According to Envirozine (Environment Canada's on line magazine) a forest fire involving primarily conifers will produce approximately 13 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide for each hectacre (2.7 acres) burned.

About 1,420 fires were burning more than 356,134 acres (139,671 hectares), according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

So, that's (356,134 acres) x (13 million tons of CO2 / 2.7 acres) = 1,714,719 MILLION tons of carbon dioxide liberated into the environment.

Hmmmm.....now that's 1.7 TRILLION tons of harmful carbon dioxides injected into our precious environment by the rubes in California, who claim to want to stop global warming, IN JUST THIS CALIFORNIA WEEK ALONE.

One thing for sure, California is incapable of managing it's forests, which are an international resource, and is HARMING the environment by dumping carbon into the atmosphere.

Posted by:Ray | June 30, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Post a comment


 

Search this blog
Advertisement
Visit daily for the latest